Constitutional Court

A few days ago, I analyzed the question made in burlesque form by one (minor) young woman whose questioning was basically Yes do there is an inconvenience that is stipulated in the Constitution, for her beer with skinny?. As a first step, popped into my mind the ironic circumstance that in this consumer society, is knowledge of almost all Colombians (by not say all) being banned in minors, the consumption of alcohol and alcoholic beverages, so that made me unusual that the girl did not know this. In my opinion, and as a reflection to the question formulated by the young, the appropriate response would be that while the political Constitution of Colombia expresses not verbatim to this forbidden consumption of beer with skinny jeans, Yes in its article 95, in the duties and obligations of Colombians, exalts and enacts that any person required to comply with the Constitution and the laws. That is, if law and Constitution that situation, were this young does not It would have to be consuming beer. For more information see this site: Jeff Gennette. The 1994 Act 124, is precisely one that governs this prohibition, and currently remains in force, waiting as the other laws of the Republic, be fulfilled by Colombians who make up this country. However, this situation with our reality, making sure I have noticed a major problem because of the lack of attention and ignorance, which receives this article 95 of the Constitution. Hopefully the prized young and in general all Colombians without any exception, bear in mind what was said by the Constitutional Court when it is mentioned that the Constitution recognizes the person and the citizen but at the same time imposes obligations (judgement T-532 of 92). Obligations do not consume alcoholic beverages with skinny jeans as you can believe the young, but if understand that as well as we have rights, we must similarly comply with our duties..

Comments off