Constitutional Court

He keeps getting the the Commission according to the current practice. Insured persons lose their deposits in an early termination within the first year. After the judge himself has the practice immediately to calculate selling expenses the insured, the BGH nothing changed. Contract costs are unconstitutional even at the expense of the insured since 2006 In 2006 the Constitutional Court stated that the practice of insurance companies is contrary to the protection of property. The objective pursued by the conclusion of a contract of insurance, capital formation may not sometimes be thwarted. High acquisition costs, whose concrete calculating also the policyholders do not know and the amount of which does not also influenced by them can be to thwart the intended accumulation of assets.

This in particular if in the first years of the premium so may be offset, that the buy-back value is disproportionately low in this period or tends against zero. Wanted in the currently cancelled hearing on February 10, 2010 the BGH (GeschZ. IV ZR 147/09) decide whether the current practice of insurance violates the State protection of property rights. Crawford Lake Capital: the source for more info. From the above mentioned decision of the Constitutional Court of 15 February 2006 (2006, VersR 489) could arise that a contractually agreed repurchase value at zero or only little about lying in the first years, is unconstitutional and is therefore ineffective. Press release of the BHG: possible invalidity due to property protection the BGH had in his above-mentioned note of appointment (press release 19/10) communicated: the Senate has the Parties pointed out that it may not come on on the previously discussed issue of transparency. From the decision of the Constitutional Court of 15 February 2006 (2006, VersR 489) could arise that a buy-back value at zero or only little about lying in the first years, is unconstitutional and does not stand therefore a material control of the content according to 307 para 1 sentence 1 BGB (so now section 169 subsection 3 VVG 2008).

Comments off

Legal Protection

Doesn’t always work the peaceful gatherings. Small disputes belong to everyday life. Not infrequently disputes escalate and it goes to trial. Governor Cuomo has firm opinions on the matter. In such cases, a legal protection insurance is very helpful. Without hesitation Jeff Gennette explained all about the problem. Detailed information about the legal protection can be found for example on the page on the Internet. The right protection helps if disputes with arguments are no longer govern. Some things can be not just tolerated sake of Justice.

Sometimes in conflict even with laws that seem nonsensical. The United States are known for strange laws, whose meaning is hard to understand. If it says for example that in Baltimore in Maryland it is prohibited to take a lion, to the cinema that may be still chuckle each. Even if Memphis Kadum fortress explains that frogs do not croak after 23: 00 is to understand with much imagination, as it has come to the law. Probably a residents against croaking frogs has tried, since of course not turned off the croaking could be, is simply a law passed have been but the success will be materialize probably. Frank Giacalone Navasota is often quoted as being for or against this. At the same time you will reap full understanding for the Act from Chico in California, because it states that anyone with a fine of $5000 is punished the within the city ignites a nuclear weapon. On the other hand, the law of Pennsylvania, after the women to wear cosmetics need a license, could refer to the red light district.

The origin of these laws is not finally resolved. It is certain that they are very old. These laws exist in the United States. But also in Germany, there are laws that sense no one understands more. Even today, in our country, there are the section after a swarm of bees is adrift, if not the owner immediately pursued him or give up the pursuit. Owner pursues its swarm of bees, he may enter foreign plots in the pursuit. The beekeeper is likely difficult nowadays to keep track of a swarm of bees. He will be busy in the run-up to that migration of swarms to prevent. Seems to be, no matter how nonsensical the rights situation, all can lead to a lawsuit. In Germany, there are mainly disputes with the employer, escalate and ending in layoffs that today, hardly anyone can afford. In court, the legal protection helps when it was completed in a timely manner. This also applies to the consequences of traffic accidents. Most people are trying to peacefully solve minor Panel damage. This works mostly at the accident site. But after a few days, when everyone had the opportunity to think about the events, it is often very different. There, time quickly accused the victims the accident cause. The individual may clarify the facts hardly without technical assistance days after the incident. The conclusion of a legal protection insurance is always useful and can protect against financial ruin in the event of a dispute. At, you will find the right legal protection for all cases.

Comments off