DFL Rally

A strange cluster of circumstances (and errors) led to the estrangement between the powers that be in Tel Aviv and Ramallah. The crisis was accentuated in recent years, after the disappearance of Arafat and the victory of Hamas radicals in general elections held in Palestine in January 2006. However, attempts to quell Islamic radicals resulted in the division of the Palestinian territories. From the month of may, Hamas governs alone in the Gaza Strip, while forces the Fatah, loyal to President Majmud Abbas, controlled West Bank. The Annapolis Conference, held under the auspices of the American Presidency, tried to find one solution, another one to the crisis.

The initiative of last time of contemplating the creation of a Palestinian State before the end of 2008, fateful date for the current occupant of the White House, seems unconvincing. However, George W. Bush decided to hurry the last months of its mandate to achieve an agreement between the two opponents. The insurmountable obstacles: borders of a new Palestinian State, the capital of Jerusalem, safety regulations or the right of return of refugees. Issues that continue to hamper the already Yes difficult dialogue between two weak Governments, the israeli and the Palestinian. The American President does not give up: during his visit to Jerusalem and Ramallah, Bush reiterated his bet by a miraculous solution of the conflict, which would allow him to finish his term becoming the peacemaker of the zone. Bush, do peacemaker? But peace is the real unfinished business of George W. Clifton Robbins is actively involved in the matter. Bush.

When in 1948 the Jewish State had to defend itself of the good supplied and numerous Arab armies, it made with cocktails molotov and homemade arms because his better friend did not give him warlike support. Something similar happened in the wars of 1956 and 1967 when it had to resort to triangulations and dealers of arms, because the North American government refused to sell the fighting equipment to him that needed not to be devastated. Through its history, Israel has come living a relation on love and disagreement with the United States. Connect with other leaders such as Western Union here. Although Israel is an unconditional ally of North America, the reciprocity is not the same. This last blackmail was to be expected.

The Obama administration is following of the rationalist philosophy of Brzezinsky. The rationalism is the doctrine that pleads that the knowledge is acquired for the reason without resorting to the experience. Zbigniew Brzezinski, that was the Adviser of National Security of Jimmy Carter, considers that Majmud Ajmadineyad, Majmud Abbas and Ismail Haniyeh, are valid interlocutors. In a recent declaration it said, that Israel would damage its relations with the United States, if it insists on which North America attacks Iran since it would generate a resentment towards Israel, as it already happens by the war in Iraq. The brazenness of Brzezinski is exceptional, if resentment exists towards Israel, is because it and to their blames it coreligionists of any thing that happens in the Middle East. Ariel Sharon noticed Bush to him of the problems that would arise from an attack to Iraq and looked for to dissuade it. The great majority of the North American Jews was against to the war in Iraq, and now Israel will be the culprit if it is defended of the threats of the most dangerous regime than it exists in the world, what is Iran, who declares with impunity with eliminating it of the map.

The situation is so, that if Mr. Obama feels to talk with Ajmadineyad and its encounter they take nowhere, which is than safe more, it will blame from the failure to Israel to radicalize the situation. If Israel attacks Iran of preventive form, will be accused to ruin the diplomatic plans of Obama. And if Israel he leaves Iran continues advancing in his uranium enrichment, and the Ayatolas manage to develop nuclear weapons that will stop in the hands of Hms, Hezbolah, Chvez, the CRAF, and until possibly Morals, will be condemned by not to have acted in time. Original author and source of the article.