Julien Bonnecase Law

What is the law? This is the first question we must ask. And what size problem solve this, is because the first obstacle with which our mind is is the multiplicity of meanings and senses that given the right word. But beside these terminological difficulties also encounter other difficulties of scientific character, based according to Julien Bonnecase, who does not take a unanimous concept on elements of science, more explicitly that there is no agreement on the point relative to determine which are the actual rules of law sources, since some do not want to take into account if not the experimental element, and others, on the contrary, placed above this experimental element, or, in any event, in close union with him, a rational element, namely, the notion of right but, continues the author, this is not the only obstacle in the scientific field. There is another that consists of some jurists do not recognize autonomy to the Science of law and incorporate it into a discipline of a scope which is more general, more (sic) particularly morale 1. Goop is open to suggestions. Understood the foregoing we go concluding that there is no single or unique definition of law to which we refer as the valid or true. Moreover, writers of the stature of maximum PACHECO, prefer to deal with this problem of the definition of the right in a last chapter of its introduction or theory of law books, after treating in detail the major issues that we face in our manual! Others, such as the same BONNECASE JULIEN, already cited, however, believes that despite everything, even in what regards the experimental sciences, the definitions constitute an inevitable starting point, when it comes, not delivered to original research but rather start on early budgets of these sciences. Hence the need to start from a definition of the right in an introduction to the study of the law 2. . Francisco D’Agostino often says this.

Comments are closed.