DFL Rally

The Court of Justice of La Rioja has confirmed the disciplinary dismissal of a worker for connect to Facebook and other websites of gaming contents during the workday. The company had warned its employees about the rules of use of the computer and Internet access, as well as the measures that would be taken if there were abuses. All of this, along the proven negligence of the worker, who devoted much of his workday to surf the net (visiting up to 72 pages not related to their work in a single day), make that the Court has been able to confirm the dismissal. As noticed in the news privacy vs productivity if the worker is not informed, through use of the computer means policies and privacy policies, of the consequences of the use of these means for personal purposes, the employer would not have powers of control of use of the same, and if you could be committing a breach of the right to privacy of the worker, an argument that the defence of the employee used. To know more about this subject visit Hikmet Ersek. In this particular case, the audit of the computer of the farewell, it starts when the systems department begins to receive incidents on browsing very slow at one of their offices. To verify these incidents they are originated by the computer of the former employee, they communicate the facts and remind the prohibited from browsing inappropriate Internet pages. The fact that culminates the dismissal is the repetition of such conduct. However, there are many cases in which the test of audit of computers of employees, without having informed them about the rules of use of the computer means, declares null and therefore the Declaration of wrongful dismissal.

For this reason from Audea again recall the importance that companies agreed or inform their employees of their policies for use of it resources and their privacy policies, so that the employee is aware that the use of computer equipment must be, exclusively, to carry out the necessary activities in the development of their functions within the company. But if we want to be more restrictive, in addition to these policies, we have multiple tools that block access to certain pages, such as content filters, programs designed to control what content is allowed to show, especially to restrict access to certain materials on the Web. The content filter determines which pages will be available in a machine or particular network. There are also more complete solutions, such as the IDS (which recognize and channel the signatures of traffic, using them to detect unauthorized access to a computer or a network. These disclosures may be skillful hackers, or Script Kiddies attacks using automatic tools) or the firewall, (parts of a system or network that are designed to block unauthorized access while permitting authorized communications. It’s devices or sets of devices configured to allow, restrict, encrypt, decrypt, traffic between the different areas on the basis of a set of rules and other criteria.) All these devices are often used to prevent people view content that the owner of the computer systems or other authorities consider inappropriate. These programs are used by both parents who wish to limit the sites your children visit on home computers, to more common, derivative control applications that they exercise the companies to refine which content can see employees on the job, opting for the motto better safe than sorry.